Comparison between body composition assessment methods in athletes: a systematic review

  • Nicolli Cariello Martins Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.
  • Fernanda Donner Alves Faculdade de Nutrição, Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis (UniRitter), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil. Programa de pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.
  • Paulo Sehl Faculdade de Educação Fí­sica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.
  • Cláudia Dornelles Schneider Programa de pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.
  • Gabriela Corrêa Souza Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.
Keywords: Body Composition, Athletes, Skinfolds, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Bioelectrical Impedance

Abstract

Introduction: different methods and protocols are used to analyze body components however there is no consensus about use or comparisons between them in athletes. Objective: identifying and describing the comparative studies about body composition evaluation methods used in athletes. Methods: this were a systematic review in which were included the keywords "athletes" and "body composition". The parameters considerate in Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs and Scielo databases were time limit, language, design and only for humans. Results: thirty of the 1.842 references met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 2,202 adult athletes from different sports. Seven different methods were identified, the most compared were anthropometry, X-ray densitometry (DXA) and bioelectrical bioimpedance (BIA); and the least used were plethysmography, infra-red and ultrasound. There was a predominance of studies where BIA presented higher values of body components when compared to other methods. Conclusion: the discrepancies between the results, populations, formulas, and equipment used difficulties the generalization of results. It is essential to standardize the evaluations within each method.

Author Biography

Fernanda Donner Alves, Faculdade de Nutrição, Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis (UniRitter), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil. Programa de pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.

Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis - Uniritter

References

-Adams, J.M. Densitometry and Osteoporosis. Berlim.Springer-Verlag.1998.

-Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia. Utilização da Bioimpedância para Avaliação da Massa Corpórea. Projeto Diretrizes. 2009.

-Astorino, T.A.; Tam, P.A.; Rietschel, J.C.; Johnson, S.M.; Freedman, T.P. Changes in physical fitness parameters during a competitive field hockey season. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 18. Num. 4. 2004. p. 850-854.

-Ballard,T.P.;Fafara,L.;Vukovich,M.D. Comparison of Bod Pod and DXA in Female Collegiate Athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Vol. 36. Núm. 4.2004. p. 731-735.

-Balshem, H.; Helfand, M.; Schünemann, H.J.; Oxman, A.D.; Kunz, R.; Brozek, J.; Vist, G.E.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Meerpohl, J.; Norris, S.; Guyatt, G.H. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Vol. 64. 2011. p. 401-406.

-Bentzur, K.M.; Kravitz, L.; Lockner, D.W. Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent body fat in collegiate track and field female athletes: a comparison of four methods. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 22. Num. 6. 2008. p. 1985-1991.

-Birzniece, V.; Khaw, C.H.; Nelson, A.E.; Meinhardt, U.; Ho, K.K.Y. A critical evaluation of bioimpedance spectroscopy analysis in estimating body composition during GH treatment: Comparison with bromide dilution and dual X-ray absorptiometry. European Journal of Endocrinology. Vol. 172. Num. 1. 2015. p. 21-28.

-Brock, D.W.; Nieman, D.C.; Utter, A.C.; Harris, G.S.; Rossi, S.J. A comparison of leg-to-leg bioelectricla impedance and underwater weighing methods in measuring body composition in caucasian and african american football athletes. Sports Medicine Trainingand Rehabilitation. Vol. 10. Num. 2. 2001. p. 95-104.

-Carvalho, H.M.; Coelho-e-Silva, M.J.; Franco, S.; Figueiredo, A.J.; Tavares, Ó.M.; Ferry, B; Hidalgo-Hermanni, I.; Courteix, D.; Malina, R.M. Agreement between anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessments of lower-limb volumes and composition estimates in youth-club rugby athletes. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. Vol. 37. Num. 3. 2012. p. 463-471.

-Civar, S.; Aktop, A.; Tercan, E.; Ozdol, Y. Validity of leg-to-legbioelectrical impedance measurement in higly active males. Biology of Sport. Vol. 20. Num. 3. 2003. p. 209-219.

-Company, J.; Ball, S. Body Composition Comparison: Bioelectric Impedance Analysis with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Adult Athletes. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Vol. 14. Num. 3. 2010. p. 186-201.

-Dempster, P.; Aitkens, S. A new air displacement method for the determination of human body composition. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Vol. 27. Num. 12. 1995. p. 1692-1697.

-Deutz, R.C.; Benardot, D.; Martin, D.E.; Cody, M.M. Relationship between energy deficits and body composition in elite female gymnasts and runners. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Vol. 32. Num. 3. 2000. p. 659-668.

-Dixon, C.B.; Deitrick, R.W.; Pierce, J.R.; Cutrufello, P.T.; Drapeau, L.L. Evaluation of the BOD POD and leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis for estimating percent body fat in national collegiate athletic association revision III Collegiate wrestlers. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 19. Num. 1. 2005. p. 85-91.

-Dixon, C.B.; Ramos, L.; Fitzgerald, E.; Reppert, D.; Andreacci, J.L. The effect of acute fluid consumption on measures of impedance and percent body fat estimated using segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Nature Publishing Group. Vol. 63. Num. 9. 2009. p. 1115-22.

-Driskell, J.A.; Wolinsky, I. Nutritional assessment of athletes. Boca Raton. CRC press.2011.

-Durnin, J.V.G.A.; Womersley, J.V.G.A. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition. Vol. 32. 1974. p. 77-97.

-Esco, M.R.; Olson, M.S.; Williford, H.N.; Lizana, S.N.; Russell, A.R. The accuracy of hand-to-hand bioelectrical impedance analysis in predicting body composition in college-age female athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 25. Num. 4. 2011. p. 1040-1045.

-Esco, M.R.; Snarr, R.L.; Leatherwood, M.D.; Chamberlain, N.A.; Redding, M.L.; Flatt, A.A.; Moon, J.R.; Williford, H.N. Comparison of total and segmental body composition using DXA and multifrequency bioimpedance in collegiate female athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 29. Num. 4. 2015. p. 918-925.

-Fornetti, W.C.; Pivarnik, J.M.; Foley, J.M.; Fiechtner, J.J. Reliability and validity of body composition measures in female athletes. Journal of applied physiology. Vol. 87. Num. 3. 1999. p. 1114-1122.

-Fukuda, D.H.; Wray, M.E.; Kendall, K.L.; Smith-Ryan, A.E.; Stout, J.R. Validity of near-infrared interactance (FUTREX 6100/XL) for estimating body fat percentage in elite rowers. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. Vol. 37. Num. 4. 2017. p. 456-458.

-Hernandez, A.J.; Nahas, R.M. Modificações dietéticas, reposição hídrica, suplementos alimentares e drogas: Comprovação de ação ergogênica potenciais riscos para a saúde. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. Vol. 15. Num. 3. 2009. p. 3-12.

-Heymsfield, S.B.; Lohman, T.G.; Wang, Z.; Going, S.B. Human Body Composition. Champaign.Human Kinetics. 2005.

-Heyward, V. ASEP Methods Recommendation: Body Composition Assessment. Journal of Exercise Physiology. Vol. 1971. Num. 1. 2002. p. 1-10.

-Houtkoopr, L.; Mullins, V.A.; Going, S.B.; Brown, C.H.; Lohman, T.G. Body composition profiles of elite American heptathletes. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. Vol. 11. Num. 2. 2001. p. 162-173.

-Kilduff, L.P.; Lewis, S.; Kingsley, M.I.C.; Owen, N.J.; Dietzig, R.E. Reliability and detecting change following short-term creatine supplementation: Comparison of two-component body composition methods. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 21. Num. 2. 2007. p. 378-384.

-Knechtle, B.; Wirth, A.; Knechtle, P.; Rosemann, T.; Rüst, C.A.; Bescós, R. Comparación de la masa grasay muscular estimada en atletas varones de ultra-resistencia utilizando la bioimpedancia eléctrica y diferentes métodos antropométricos. Nutricion Hospitalaria. Vol. 26. Num. 6. 2011. p. 1420-1427.

-Kyle, U.G.; Bosaeus, I.; De Lorenzo, A.D.; Deurenberg, P.; Elia, M.; Manuel Gómez, J.; Lilienthal Heitmann, B.; Kent-Smith, L.; Melchior, J.C.; Pirlich, M.; Scharfetter, H.; Schols, A.; Pichard, C. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition. Vol. 23. Num. 6. 2004. p. 1430-1453.

-Leahy, S.; O’Neill, C.; Sohun, R.; Jakeman, P.; Neill, C.O.; Sohun, R. A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology. Vol. 112. Num. 2. 2012. p. 589-595.

-Loenneke, J.P.; Barnes, J.T.; Wagganer, J.D.; Pujol, T.J. Validity of a portable computer-based ultrasound system for estimating adipose tissue in female gymnasts. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. Vol. 34. Num. 5. 2014. p. 410-412.

-Loenneke, J.P.; Wray, M.E.; Wilson, J.M.; Barnes, J.T.; Kearney, M.L.; Pujol, T.J. Accuracy of field methods in assessing body fat in collegiate baseball players. Research in Sports Medicine. Vol. 21. Num. 3. 2013. p. 286-291.

-Malavolti, M.; Mussi, C.; Poli, M.; Fantuzzi, A.L.; Salvioli, G.; Battistini, N.; Bedogni, G. Cross-calibration of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in healthy subjects aged 21-82 years. Annals of Human Biology. Vol. 30. Num. 4. 2003. p. 380-391.

-Mouad, M.; Matias, C.N.; Santos, D.A.; Teixeira, V.H.; Sardinha, L.B.; Silva, A.M. Validação da bioimpedância elétrica por multifrequência em atletasValidation of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in. Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento. Vol. 23. Num. 1. 2015. p. 48-57.

-Ostojic, S. Estimation of body fat in athletes: skinfold vs bioelectrical impedance. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. Vol. 46. Num. 3. 2006. p. 422.

-Peeters, M.W.; Goris, M.; Keustermans, G.; Pelgrim, K.; Claessens, A.L. Body composition in athletes: a comparison of densitometric methods and tracking of individual differences. European Journal of Sport Science. Vol. 13. Num. 1. 2013. p. 1-8.

-Pineau, J.C.; Filliard, J.R.; Bocquet, M. Ultrasound techniques applied to body fat measurement in male and female athletes. Journal of Athletic Training. Vol. 44. Num. 2. 2009. p. 142-147.

-Raymond, C.J.; Dengel, D.R.; Bosch, T.A. Total And Segmental Body Composition Examination In Collegiate Football Players Using Multifrequency Bia And Dxa. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 32. Num. 3. 2018. p. 772-782.

-Rech, C.R.; Ferreira, L.D.A.; Cordeiro, B.A.; Guedes, F.D.A.; Petroski, E.L. Estimativa da composição corporal por meio da absortometria radiológica de dupla energia. Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento. Vol. 15. Num. 48. 2008. p. 87-97.

-Santos, D.A.; Dawson, J.A.; Matias, C.N.; Rocha, P.M.; Minderico, C.S.; Allison, D.B.; Sardinha, L.B.; Silva, A.M. Reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes. PLoS One. Vol. 9. Num. 5. 2014.

-Saunders, M.J.; Blevins, J.E.; Broeder, C.E. Effects of hydration changes on bioelectrical impedance in endurance trained individuals. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Vol. 30. Num. 6. 1998. p. 885-892.

-Sparling, P.B. Bone mineral density and body composition of the United States Olympic women’s field hockey team. British Journal of Sports Medicine. Vol. 32. Num. 4. 1998. p. 305-308.

-Stewart, A.D.; Hannan, W.J. Prediction of fat and fat-free mass in male athletes using dual X-ray absorptiometry as the reference method. Journal of Sports Sciences. Vol. 18. Num. 4. 2000. p. 263-274.

-Stroup, D.F.; Berlin, J.A.; Morton, S.C.; Olkin, I.; Williamson, G.D.; Rennie, D; Moher, D.; Becker, B.J., Sipe, T.A.; Thacker, S.B. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. Vol. 283. Num. 15. 2000. p. 2008-2012.

-Svantesson, U.; Zander, M.; Klingberg, S.; Slinde, F. Body composition in male elite athletes, comparison of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine. Vol. 7. Num. 1. 2008. p. 1-5.

-Vescovi, J.D.; Hildebrandt, L.; Miller, W.; Hammer, R.; Spiller, A. Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent fat in female college athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 16. Num. 4. 2002. p. 599-605.

-Wagner, D.R.; Cain, D.L.; Clark, N.W. Validity and reliability of a-mode ultrasound for body composition assessment of NCAA division i athletes. PLoS One. Vol. 11. Num. 4. 2016. p. 1-12.

-Warner, E.R.; Fornetti, W.C.; Jallo, J.J.; Pivarnik, J.M. A skinfold model to predict fat-free mass in female athletes. Journal of Athletic Training. Vol. 39. Num. 3. 2004. p. 259-262.

-Williams, C.A.; Bale, P. Bias and limits of agreement between hydrodensitometry, bioelectrical impedance and skinfold calipers measures of percentage body fat. European journal of applied physiology and occupational. Vol. 77. Num. 3. 1998. p. 271-277.

-Winter, E.M.; Jones, A.M.; Davison, R.R.; Bromley, P.D.; Mercer T. Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines. Routledge. 2007.

-Zapolska, J.; Witczak, K.; Manczuk, A.; Ostrowska, L.; Mańczuk, A.; Ostrowska, L. Assessment of nutrition, supplementation and body composition parameters on the example of professional volleyball players. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny. Vol. 65. Num. 3. 2014. p. 235-242.

Published
2020-08-04
How to Cite
Martins, N. C., Alves, F. D., Sehl, P., Schneider, C. D., & Souza, G. C. (2020). Comparison between body composition assessment methods in athletes: a systematic review. RBNE - Brazilian Journal of Sports Nutrition, 13(82), 912-922. Retrieved from https://www.rbne.com.br/index.php/rbne/article/view/1478
Section
Scientific Articles - Original